Revenge of the Cybermen |
BBC Earthshock |
|
| Episodes | 4 |  |
| Story No# | 122 | |
| Production Code | 6B | |
| Season | 19 | |
| Dates | Mar. 8, 1982 - Mar. 16, 1982 |
|
With Peter Davison, Matthew Waterhouse,
Janet Fielding, Sarah Sutton. Written by Eric Saward. Script-edited by Anthony Root. Directed by Peter Grimwade. Produced by John Nathan-Turner. |
| Synopsis: A deadly plot is set into motion on 25th century Earth by the Cybermen, where the Doctor is thought to be a conspirator. |
A Review by Will Berridge 29/8/03
Earthshock's first episode begins in a more than typical fashion for a season atypical of the traditional DW format. We have an argument between two members of the TARDIS (The Doctor and Adric on this occasion. It's normally two of the Doctor, Adric and Tegan, not Nyssa who just stands aside thinking 'It's all rather silly, isn't it?'), and plentiful references to previous stories, including Full Circle, Warrior's Gate, Logopolis and Black Orchid. These represent an attempt to introduce to the series two concepts which previous writers had not seen as necessary to guarantee success; continuity and soap. The new focus on continuity (which remained till the cancellation) isn't something that particularly irks me, even though I'm someone who tends to take a hop, skip and a jump through DW chronology when choosing what to watch. Only one of them is completely superficial in any case, (the Doctor reading the Black Orchid), the rest being pertinent to Adric's return to E-Space (though this is a bit of a red herring in itself, in plot terms, just serving as an excuse to get Adric hacked off.) Worryingly, however, concern for continuity does seem to be indicative of a greater emphasis by the writers to make the show more 'realistic'. This does seem to be why the other novel aspect of Season 19 which does perturb me, that is the increasing attempts to turn my favourite SF show into a soap opera, originated. In my mind SF and Soap, as forms of drama, have two entirely different prerogatives. Soap is all about the trials and tribulations of everyday, real, life, SF is all about escaping from the depression of reality into an SURRealistic universe of time-travelling Police Boxes. If I wanted to see a teenager year-old whinge about not being paid attention to, I'd watch Neighbours. I don't.
Anyway, fortunately this only ever happened in Season 19 DW, being a far less prevalent approach than in American SF series like Star Trek other trashy modern SF. Even here it only causes 10 minutes of torture at the start of the episode, so this minor rant aside, I don't completely hate Earthshock. In fact I disagree with quite a few of the criticisms the Post-modernists have made. For a start, The Discontinuity Guide complains 'Emotional concepts expressed by the Cybermen include betrayal, vengeance and cruelty.' This strikes me as a trifle unfair. Why?
The plot, specifically in terms of the cyber-planning, also seems to have been criticised somewhat over-zealously ('good.for a first draft' is The Discontinuity Guide opinion), and makes sense to me. Till the final episode, anyway, where I get completely lost. Anyway, to respond to some of the complaints:
It's a very large niggle, but as Mark Irvin points out, who really cares if you can settle back and enjoy the action? Well, then, is the action any good? It helps that Davison's Doctor is at least on form. He shows plenty of sparkling wit (the '.you would be rather crumpled' line makes me crack up), and a great deal of genuine concern and anxiety in the last episode as he is impotent to prevent the Cybermen showing the weakness of his emotions and conquering Earth. There's a tremendous deal of evidence for his flawed, indecisive, anti-heroic character in this one. Have you noticed it seems to take an age for his to make his mind up to stop the Cyberman killing Tegan? Enough time for him to have followed the Cyber-Leader's orders and gunned her down. And as the freighter hurtles towards Earth, he seems incapable of thinking up of any action which might prevent Earth's destruction, and just watches only helplessly, to the point he drives Tegan beserk. In the end it's only fortuitous chance which resolves the situation for him. And, of course, the death of Adric raises a few interesting questions. Could the Doctor have avoided his companion getting killed if he hadn't taken such a reckless attitude towards investigating the genocidal planters of the bomb he has just defused? Adric has every right to be worried when he tracks them to their bases and starts shouting 'I want to announce my presence!, and it's arguably this flippant 'Oh well I've got 7 other lives left in any case' attitude that leaves his slightly more ephemeral colleague doomed in the end. It's surprising the Valeyard never brought it up in the Trial, in fact.
Unfortunately apart from Davison, and occasionally the amusing tension between Ringway and the ship's captain, there aren't any characters worth watching. Adric is still a nauseating monkey-face adolescent, even if he becomes a heroic nauseating monkey-faced adolescent. All this achieves is incongruity. Tegan behaves stupidly throughout the whole adventure- if she thinks the Cyber-leader's plan has failed because Earth will register the TARDIS, why does she try and tell him? And then there's Nyssa. Nyssa's the sort of person who you'd have to play tig with and set a time limit on staying in the den. She spends the whole adventure hiding in the TARDIS, criticising everyone when they go out, and explaining to Kyle how little there is they can do. In fact, these two characters share 4 or 5 pointless, pointless scenes in the TARDIS in eps 3 and 4, which only go to show how much of a struggle was being had writing Nyssa into plots as a 4th companion. But why is Kyle there? She performs no function at all after the first episode so she should just have been killed of then! There's no particular sense of importance to her death, despite the emphasis on Scott's rather bland statement of 'It's too late. She's dead.' Oh no, I wasn't going to let him off the hook. He is the single most painful character I have ever had to endure. He's a traditional single-minded military idiot, but I don't even find him amusing, probably since he has no obvious personality whatsoever. His generic lines are too often delivered in excruciatingly embarrassing fashion- 'The hold is.CRAWLING with robots', and 'I realise going down again must be.HARD.' Ouch, ouch, ouch.
Despite all these irritating moments, however, the story maintains attention throughout. It is helped by the tale starting off with an impressively tense first episode set in the caves, where the Doctor helps defuse and bomb and destroy a couple of androids who seem capable of turning human beings into an impressively gooey mess. The Cyberman take-over of the freighter is also relatively exciting, largely due to the funky march music, and there's one great shot of a Cyberman stuck in a wall which the Doctor makes re-solidify around him. It's a pity, however, that when then do eventually break through, the doors don't seem to be made of steel, or anti-matter or whatever it is. Something distinctly more, well... papery, actually. 7/10.
A Review by Gareth McG 23/9/03
The 1980s, in general, was certainly a fun time, though rather inevitably it is a decade that has become synonymous with the term "all style and no substance" and in many ways that may help to explain why the once awe inspiring Earthshock might feel a little flat and one-dimensional when viewed today. It looks great for its time. The direction is highly impressive and this is probably as disturbing and atmospheric as Doctor Who had been in years. The dark, gloomy caves of the first episode are wonderful as is the impending death-warnings forecast by the flares on the scanner. The sinister looking androids pre-date the critically acclaimed Raston Warrior Robot of The Five Doctors by a full year and a half. The flashback sequence of previous Cybermen adventures is exciting, relevant and very well done, the red tint giving it a seamless, timeless look.
The whole thing is also great fun and those complaining about emotional Cybermen are really missing the point of Earthshock because its main purpose is to entertain and emotionless Cybermen are certainly not good entertainers. They're frightening for kids, for adults they work on another appropriate level becoming hilariously camp, the different pitches with which they express their delight ("Exxxcellllent") becoming, as intended, hysterically funny and one of the great joys of the show. But the crucial thing about the Cybermen here is that they deliver a superb performance and, asides from the Doctor, they are the only characters that give great value. It is not just their superb look and towering presence that make their highly anticipated return all the more glorious but also their ruthlessly determined streak. Their basic drive here is survival. Their whole existence is under threat from Earth's superpowers and their options are to destroy or be destroyed. As if to emphasise their determination they have an ingenious contingency plan up their sleeves. Once the Doctor has foiled their original plan they immediately proceed to turn the freighter into a flying bomb set for Earth. I'll never forget as a youngster feeling a real sense of doom for the Doctor and his crew as the metal meanies penetrated and took command of the one great refuge that we could usually always rely on - the TARDIS.
In mentioning that I like the Cybermen's motivation it's fair to conclude that I like most of Earthshock's plot. It's nothing spectacular but at least by staying simple it doesn't turn into a muddled mess like its sister-in-law, Resurrection of the Daleks. Well, that is with one awful exception - the very contrived dinosaur extinction bit tacked onto the end. Again this shows Doctor Who's unfortunate habit of abusing its time travel concepts. Saward deserved to be pleased with himself for fusing the plot of The Visitation with The Great Fire of London and so he decided that he wanted to do the same again. So he considers another one of the great unexplained mysteries of Earth's history and rather predictably comes up with the dinosaurs. But hold on we can't have the Cybermen waging war on the ancient world because there were no humans around at the time to pose any threat to them. Oh well, let's just set the whole adventure in the future and then transport it back in time right at the end. Who cares that the Cybermen have no idea about what time travel involves. The kids will hardly bat an eyelid. Problem solved. Not so. Analysing Doctor Who these days with such a critical eye is very worthwhile if it means that lazy scripting ideas like this don't escape judgement. In retrospect it forecasts the chaos to come in Resurrection because here is a writer whose had an idea and is determined to run with it no matter how many logical hazards seem to stand in its way.
Even more of a problem here is a cast is full of boring characters and uninspired actors. Davison does well, and even if that might seem a bit biased it's worth adding that the staunchest Fifth Doctor critics seem to agree that this is one of his best outings. Tegan, at least, gets one great line and Nyssa, despite being left out for the most part, delivers the most touching reaction to the tragic finale when she screams "Adric". Unfortunately the rest are poor to put it mildly. I'd almost forgotten about Kyle, Berger and Ringway an hour after watching this story, I wished that the androids had disposed of Scott in the first five minutes so that we didn't have to bear him for the remainder and, while Beryl Reid might not be the disaster that many people believe, her performance is nothing to write home about either.
Of course the great irony of Earthshock is that while it is renowned for the return of one of the show's greatest audience grabbers it is also renowned for the death of one of the shows greatest ever turn-offs. So what of the mathematical geniuses demise? Well, I have to wonder why his passing seems to have somewhat redeemed his much maligned reputation because it is a far from glorious send-off. I just wish that Adric's survival instincts could have matched that of his tin counterparts because, frankly, a central character should never die as meekly as he does. I don't deny that it's an emotional moment but really it should have been much more so. Indeed the fact that Dr. Who usually handles these leaving scenes so sensitively (Jo's, Sarah's, Tegan's and most of the regenerations) makes this missed opportunity all the harder to bear. Adric should have been bashing desperately at that keyboard until the second before he died, trying in vain to get it to work even if deep down he knew he was done for. Then one last close up of his doomed, tear drenched face. As it is, you get the impression that he's ambivalent about the prospect of death - his last line is just so cringeworthy - and if he doesn't care for his own survival then why should the audience? To add insult to injury the credits sequence for the new DVD documentary is also so much more effective than the original silent ending.
So Earthshock doesn't really stand up today as adult viewing material where sound acting and bullet-proof plots are all important. Nevertheless it's still easy enough to appreciate what this might have meant to an impressionable youngster back in 1982. For myself, and probably for most kids of my age, it featured a TARDIS crew that I was extremely fond of, featured a dazzling array of memorable images and invoked a whole load of emotions from being frightening to being a load of fun to being terribly sad. And, when all's said and done, arguably the most important thing about Doctor Who has always been the reaction that it sparked in kids down through the years. So Earthshock is pure nostalgia and, even if taking another look at it today may tarnish its reputation slightly, it's still worth it just to bring back a flood of poignant memories.
A Review by Keith Bennett 23/4/04
We're all different, aren't we? Whether Doctor Who fans love stories like Earthshock or not, depend on whether they can overlook gaping plot holes (which, I don't think, any of us deny actually exist in the story) in favour of the action, or not.
I can. I remember being enthralled when I first saw this story on its initial screening. Like seemingly everyone else, I loved the first episode, and gave an amazed cry of "The Cybermen!!" as the ending credits started to role. The rest of the story held me gripped throughout, and then at the end... the death of Adric...
Nowadays, I can appreciate that Adric could be irritating (at least) sometimes, but at his death the first time I saw it, I was in shock. Straight afterwards, I cried for an hour in my bedroom (hey, I was much younger then). I was never going to watch Doctor Who again. I never wanted to see anyone killed in any television programme or film again (like many young boys, I had a fascination with people getting killed). This was too much.
Of course, by the next morning, I was all better, and couldn't really care less whether they actually did go back in time to save Adric (as I had hoped) or not.
But these factors remain marvellous. Having just watched it, I was gripped by the last episode... knowing what was going to happen, or not... Nyssa crying out "Adric!"... the boy looking at the wrecked console... Brilliant stuff.
The rest has its pluses and minuses. True, Nyssa has little to do, but that's sometimes inevitable when you have a three-companion TARDIS crew. Scott and co tend to annoy me with their "tough dude" talk (it's something that I rarely find inspiring, hence my less than great adoration for Ace), but the Cybermen, even if they do show emotions, are good. I also lile Beryl Reid - she has that down-to-earth style I like.
The early argument between the Doctor and Adric does annoy me, especially as the squabbles are getting a bit tiresome by this stage, but it does lead up to a quite lovely making up scene. I think that remains one of the best Doctor-companion interchanges in the programme's history.
Overall, I love this story. It's exciting and it's entertaining; something, I'm afraid, I don't think too many of the other Davison stories are. I'm still to make up my mind on Caves Of Androzani, but at the moment, I would have to say that Earthshock is definitely my favourite Davison story, and one of my favourite Doctor Who adventures of all.
A Review by Ryan Thompson 17/6/04
A surprisingly triumphant return for the second most important villan in Doctor Who history. Eric Saward's scripts for this episode fall prey to most aspects of the 'Davison' syndrome, but they're also brimming with action, twists, atmosphere and even a few mould-breaking ideas. While this may not be the most coherent story, the abscence of the technically minded Kit Pedlar in Gerry Davis' pathetic solo effort, The Revenge of the Cybermen, is readily apparent.
But make no mistake, Earthshock is no typical Davison fodder. The images and concepts are a key aspect to this story's success but there are also some prevailing moral themes. There's a sense of timing and spontanaiety with the many plot twists. Now for the downsides.
The cave/hatch/android subplot is not very well thought out and only the regulars and the freighter crew are well acted. The troops are pritty hopeless there. The commander is a cross between Lethbridge Stewart and Buck Rodgers. "Why draw attention to yourselves and your bomb by attacking on the first day?". I think it would make a lot more sense to say "Why draw attention to yourselves by waiting". I guess I don't function as logically as the Cybermen.
There are several more signifigant plot holes I won't mention here because I'm not a spoiler. There are probably more tightly plotted Davison stories that I would not give such a favorable review to because they don't recapture the feel of a classic sci-fi 60s/70s episode as this one does. Matthew Waterhouse gives his only good performance since the departure of Tom Baker. The scenes in the frieghter generate an absolutely classic atmosphere. The scenes in which the cybermen emerge have to rank at the top of the series. I see this story as less like a replication of the Troughton themes (base under siege) and more like a tribute.
John Nathan Turner's production style is just what the Doctor ordered here. It gives the story a remarkably artistic feel and emphasizes the fact that this is a modern rework of the Cybermen. Yet it doesn't undermine the classicism of the story. A solid effort with a few flaws and a poignant ending. 7/10
Simply the best by Adrian Sherlock 29/6/04
Where does one start with a story like Earthshock? I was in my fourth year of secondary school when this story hit the screens. The last time I'd seen the series, season seventeen had climaxed with the Horns of Nimon. Now seasons 18 and 19 had screened in one long run on Australian TV and I was spellbound, it seemed that it just couldn't get any better. And then the Cybermen appeared! Wow! And as the story swept towards it's conclusion, I somehow felt that I was watching the best story of all time and that nothing would ever come close to this again. And then Adric died. And as the credit rolled in silence, I thought, while Adric was not the best character, this is so great, why not just go with it and appreciate it for what it is, he's actually died and that's stunning, because the good guys just don't die in Dr.Who.
Ofcourse I'd been impressed by Dr. Who stories before Earthshock, Genesis of the Daleks was pretty special, and I would be impressed again, The Five Doctors, Resurrection of the Daleks and Caves of Androzani were yet to come. But somehow, nothing ever seemed to match the impact of Earthshock. This is a story where the inventiveness and showmanship of the writer is so totally visible on screen, you can almost feel his presence and it is not surprising to me that Eric Saward became Dr. Who's equivalent of Quentin Tarantino, suddenly in the spotlight and under huge pressure to repeat his success. It's startling then, to realise that Earthshock's darkly stylish and slick techno-thriller, which emulates Alien and predicts the style of James Cameron (two years before Terminator!) while brilliantly reinventing classic Hartnell/Troughton Who as 80s art, is absolutely nothing like the charming simplicity and Robert Holmes style character play of The Visitation. It is even more startling to take a look at Revelation of the Daleks with its delicious black humour, its ensemble cast of grotesque characters and its arty line in graphic horror and realise that it too, is a million miles away from Earthshock. It is also interesting to note the straightforward and almost naive feel of Earthshock's narrative thrust compared to the complicated and dense plot and murky morality of Resurrection of the Daleks.
But the most astonishing thing of all is that in the 20 years since Earthshock's legendary first broadcast, Eric Saward's reputation has been based almost entirely on Attack on the Cybermen! Even worse, many fans and reviewers seem to think all of Saward's scripts are essentially the same as Attack of the Cybermen. This is bizarre really, because not only are they totally different in terms of the basic premise, but the fact is no two Saward stories even employ a similar approach to narrative structure, character focus, theme, tone, or anything else.
The Visitation has only one proper guest character, Mace, and the rest of the time is focused entirely of the regulars. Revelation barely features the Doctor and Peri at all for the most part.
And Resurrection of the Daleks is complicated to a degree that it is a challenge to follow it.
Earthshock is totally in a league of its own. Lacking any of the Ian Levine influence on the later Attack story, Earthshock is more like Robots of Death, featuring a small, cynical group of humans who are trapped in a confined area inside a dark, futuristic ship and faced with a horde of cold, implacable mechanical killers. The blank faced androids and the gleaming silver Cybermen are a truly menacing adversary and the Doctor's moral and philosphical perspective is beautifully and eloquently scripted as he faces the Cyberleader. The time travel twist is also deeply ironic and revealed like a trump card by the writer, adding deep layers of ironic meaning to the story and illustrating the limits of machine logic. By helping to create the human race, the Cybermen have helped ensure their own defeat. So much for their assertion that nothing can go wrong because they are so logical and superior. David Banks should be complimented too, for convingly mimmicking the human persona, he comes across as chillingly as being threatened by the talking clock, all his words given a jarring and unnatural delivery. And check out his cold reaction to one of his own men dying at his feet, dripping machine fluid. "Very skilled resistance", he notes. A million miles from the emotional reactions of the Tardis crew to the death of Adric. And that's Saward's point. To us, death is tragic, we care about each other. The true horror of the Cybermen is that they simply do not care, they cause pain and suffering but they cannot experience it.
By accident or design, the death of Adric juxtaposed with the return of the Cybermen, an emotional event placed beside a race of emotionless creatures, makes a very provocative and memorable impact.
This is a unique story and probably the best story ever made, bar none. I can understand that people would complain that some Dr. Who seems campy, cheap or badly done, but this story is so totally the opposite, that criticising Earthshock is almost like criticising a story for not being cheap, and campy enough! It's been two decades since I first saw Earthshock and I am never going to be a fifteen year old boy again, so I doubt that anything will ever have the same impact on me as this story again. I'd like the new series with Christopher Eccleston to blow me away and prove me wrong, but I have a feeling that in another 20 years, I will still be saying the same thing. The best Dr. Who story I ever saw was called Earthshock. It was the one where the Cybermen came back, the dinosaurs died out because of an unexpected time warp and Adric died in a massive explosion and the credits rolled in silence. It was vastly more than the sum of its parts and compared to the Ewoks which were dominating cinema screens in 1983 and the childish antics of Buck Rogers and repeats of rubbery monster filled Lost In Space that were on TV at the time, this story was so real and so powerful that it seemed to be in a class by itself. Earthshock. A masterpiece. Simple.
Shock Earth by Jonathan Martin 24/10/04
Ah, the 80’s. So stylish… After watching lots of early 70’s DW lately, I just had a real craving for pretty colours, flashing lights, and lots of whiz-bang action, thus Earthshock was slid in to the DVD player, though naturally there are plenty of other candidates from this particular decade.
Here, the Doctor and his homeboys encounter a brand new race of evil opponents! Oh, they’ll have you believe that they’re the Doctor’s old enemies from those 60’s classics, but I’m not convinced. Their appearance may be somewhat reminiscent, and they’re still spouting lines about having none of those silly things we call emotions, but someone forgot the little fact that to be emotionless you actually have to avoid incorporating emotion in to your speech patterns. Our Cybermen friends go through the entire emotional rainbow here. And Cybermen don’t stand around corridors nattering away to their pals about their local football team or whatever it happened to be. Clearly their local team is far from successful, as our silver friends march around with permanent snarls on their faces.
I don’t particularly care for their re-styled appearance however… they’re a little too tinfoil-like, and I don’t like the ‘line’ across the middle of their faces. Being able to see someone’s mouth moving behind the chin piece is an interesting idea, which harkens back to the original idea of them being part-man and part-machine, with the remnants of a humanoid body still kicking around under the tinfoil. Whatever changes they’ve gone through, the Cybermen remain powerful and threatening here… Davison once more indicates he’s more talented then his blandish characterisation will allow. His delivery of “Cybermen” upon the first sighting of his old friends is more effective then any other Doctor could probably manage. I could see the typical reaction from other Doctors being one of grim acceptance, but Davison genuinely sounds scared shitless.
Young Adric buys it and the end of this story, which you’re most probably aware of. Thus, he is even allowed to usurp Tegan as ‘top companion’ in regards to things to do. *Shrugs* I never minded Adric, he made a change. And he does all right in his last story, and one could imagine the scenes when he and the Doctor first arrive on the freighter being quite fun if he was paired with the ‘less immature’ former incarnation of the Doctor.
People like mentioning plot-holes but it doesn’t worry yours truly… it all held together for me. Ringway’s characterization is the only thing that makes me go ‘huh?’ He goes from seemingly being genuinely concerned about the fate of members of his crew, to stating how much of a “joy” it will be to kill the Doctor, even though I can’t really see why he would have such a grudge against him, seeing as he would have known that it was the Cybermen that killed the crew-members. Just noticed how many reviews of Earthshock there already is on this site, I’m probably just repeating stuff everbody else has said.
What makes commenting on a story like Earthshock so popular, as opposed to a story such as Terminus or Four to Doomsday? Because Earthshock is real impact televison despite its faults, and that is to be admired, and appreciated.
A Review by Finn Clark 30/4/06
It's H.R. Giger's Alien series all in one story!
Episode one was the first time I've thought that a TV story ripped off James Cameron's Aliens (1986), which is doubly impressive since Earthshock predates that story by four years. Dan Abnett made a few risible attempts in DWM's comic strip, but Earthshock's opening is pure Aliens. A civilian female accompanies a squad of gun-toting troopers down into a place where monsters will kill them off one by one. They even have the equivalent of those motion detectors which are there to warn the audience when death's a-comin'.
In episode two we move to the freighter, a setting so reminiscent of Ridley Scott's original Alien (1979) that Janet Fielding namechecks it on the DVD commentary. Both stories showcase freighters crewed by space trucking grunts bitching about their bonuses until the point where they start getting killed off. Both stories have a hidden traitor in the crew. Tegan even gets a Sigourney Weaver moment, blasting a Cyberman at point-blank range. It's harder to find links to Alien3 (1992) and Alien Resurrection (1997), but the former film kills off its lead character and the latter is about blurring the lines between the aliens and humans before culminating in the aliens heading for Earth in their now-depopulated spaceship.
Importantly Earthshock is one of the few scary eighties stories, or at least intense. It's well lit, by which I mean gloom! Part one does great things with darkness, reducing its androids to sinister half-seen shapes. Even the line of trotting troopers' helmet lights becomes eerie, like monster's eyes.
The production design is convincing, with pitch-black caves, a splendid freighter set and lots of tough-looking hardware. I love the TARDIS toolkit, which went on to appear in the Doctor Who Technical Manual and thus eventually the 1996 TVM. I initially thought the new Cyber-designs were too 'busy', losing the mask-like quality of their blank Troughton-era predecessors, but they're effective in close-up. I particularly like the glass jaw, which is the only time we've ever had the Cybermen's organic origins acknowledged in visual design.
They're too chatty, though. There's at least one "excellent" when a silent shot would have worked better.
So is this a rare case of strong production rescuing a half-arsed script? Good director, good designer... and Eric Saward? Some would say so, but not me. There's some head-scratching plot logic if you look for it, but unlike Resurrection of the Daleks the story always feels straightforward. Killer androids! A bomb! A freighter heading for Earth! Cybermen! It never feels muddled, even when you're looking for the plot holes.
Personally I think this story is well-written. It does everything it's trying to do. Adric's death works. The dinosaur foreshadowing does rather spell things out for the kiddies, but I suppose you can't assume that 9.1 million viewers are all au fait with their prehistory. It's educational and of course in service of a delicious irony in episode four. However the most important thing is that the story has good scares. Cybermen approaching the bridge is a "yikes" moment, as is Tegan and some soldiers finding themselves surrounded by an awakening Cyber-division. Possibly the creepiest Cyberman of them all is the one that does for Adric by staggering from the darkness and blasting the keyboard before expiring with a mechanical death rattle.
Personally I think it's Saward's best script. The Visitation needed more intrigue and complexity, while Resurrection of the Daleks needed a lot less. As for Revelation of the Daleks... well, it's enthralling and ironic, but nothing happens in part one. Earthshock has a ruthless simplicity to its storytelling.
The guest actors try valiantly in some fairly thankless roles, but I loved Beryl Reid. Theoretically the Captain should be just another tough-talking idiot in a script that's full of them, but she's more watchable than the rest of them put together. Alec Sabin is kinda creepy as Ringway, but ultimately, as always, Davison's the main man. Look at his choices in part one's Adric bitch scenes. He could have played it straight and made Adric look even more like an unlikeable whiner, but instead he goes deeper. He makes the situation real. He plays what Adric's complaining about. Some of Peter Davison's finest work in Doctor Who involved pressing diamonds from coal. He's astonishing in Warriors of the Deep, for instance, and that's also true here. He justifies Matthew Waterhouse's performance. It's kinda like acting for two.
Incidentally the Doctor and Adric have a strange relationship. In many ways they're equals. They speak the same technobabble and they've been TARDIS-travelling together longer than the girls have. Earthshock eventually splits the crew along gender lines, putting the Doctor with Adric as in the old days. What's more, Adric's right in his complaints! It's his own dumb fault, but he is treated differently. Look at how reluctant the Doctor is to enter his room, though you can hardly blame him considering the argument that blows up when he does. Suddenly the Doctor's effectively a father with a moody teenager, whereas with his other companions he'd been a best friend. He handles it surprisingly badly, actually.
Donning my fanboy head, these Cybermen are blatantly time-travellers from the future, with these Cyberwars being the very cause of their disappearance 500 years before Tomb of the Cybermen. Two of the three clips on the Cyber-scanner are from stories that haven't happened yet, but more importantly an Earth freighter becomes time-capable when linked to a Cyber-computer! The Cyberleader even knows that a TARDIS only needs one pilot despite never seeing the TARDIS in any previous story, while Cyber-technology can detect the TARDIS in flight as it approaches the freighter.
Earthshock's Cybermen are blatantly emotional, but this works better than in The Moonbase and Revenge because David Banks is a decent actor who's putting the effort in. There's a good case for saying that our fan perceptions of the Cybermen are thanks to David Banks digging into Doctor Who history and eventually writing that Cybermen book... all for the sake of playing a rubber-suited monster! I don't mind Cyber-emotions. They're simply in denial.
The script has some good lines, although it's no coincidence that they always seem to come from the better actors. I relished Beryl Reid's "I've just composed a particularly nasty epitaph for him" and Peter Davison's "You would be very crumpled."
Ultimately however this story is about Adric's death. It's an unusual kind of tragedy. He's giving his life trying to save a world he barely knows, but he's doomed to fail and had he succeeded he'd have destroyed mankind as we know it. We even know that as we watch. Brrrrr. Sadly we'll never recapture the shock value of the original broadcast, but there's some nice foreshadowing and the tragedy works in a different way with foreknowledge. I think they cut away too fast from the explosion, but the sequence's power comes from the regulars' reactions and the silent closing titles. It's better not to think about Fielding, Sutton and Davison trying not to giggle, though.
Sometimes I think that fan opinion differs more on Earthshock than on any other story. Eric Saward: shockingly incompetent or one of the greats? He has his critics, to put it mildly, but personally I think this story is a winner.
A Review by Brian May 11/4/07
Earthshock was Doctor Who's first blockbuster, an attempt to catch up with the torrent of sci-fi action movies that cropped up in the late seventies and early eighties. While obviously unable to match the budgetary likes of Lucasfilm, it still looks impressive, with its spaceships, robots, macho soldiers, big guns blazing and new improved Cybermen. The sets are very good and, glory be, it's wonderfully underlit! The camera work and editing are fast and furious, while Peter Grimwade's direction is spectacular. He wasn't the most-liked man on set, as several actors comment on in the DVD feature - and the excerpt from the 1986 interview does make him look a bit of a pompous martinet, but if that's what it takes for him to come up with the finished product as we see it on screen, then so be it.
For such an action runaround, the story is unevenly paced: the first part is one of the slowest set-ups in a Doctor Who story for ages. At times it feels like a Hartnell episode, especially with the focus on character interactions - which, for the first time with the season 19 TARDIS crew, actually works. But there's a dark, dank and doom-laden atmosphere throughout, assisted by some fantastic music. Part two has quick bursts of action: the Doctor's attempts to defuse the bomb especially, but it's still fairly leisurely compared to the final half, when it explodes in a frenzy of tension and thrills. I remember when I first saw it in 1982 it was practically unbearable. There's so much going on; the Cybermen marching through the dark corridors of the freighter (complemented by Malcolm Clarke most memorable composition), the attempts to stop them taking the bridge, the lone Cyberman trying to infiltrate the TARDIS, and above all the ultimate the race against time to rescue Adric and the ultimate shock when this fails. Such an unrelenting build-up and the subsequent pyrrhic victory are startling; it remains one of Doctor Who's best scenes. And even though I'm an Adric-disliker (not quite hater!), his death still tugs at the heartstrings.
It all makes Earthshock another success for John Nathan-Turner and his approach to the programme. Making the Doctor more human is a nice change and the right move after the Tom Baker era, and Peter Davison understands this perfectly, astutely pinpointing his character's vulnerability. Most of the acting is quite good: Matthew Waterhouse seems to have upped his game for his last regular performance, and is often very convincing as Adric. In fact, his "It's not our problem, Doctor" in part two is perhaps his finest moment. His delivery has all the restrained emphasis it requires; his quiet chat with the Doctor in the TARDIS en route to the freighter is another example. Waterhouse occasionally relapses into his usual awkwardness, but it's good to see him go out with a bang (sorry, couldn't resist!) There's only one performance that irks me, and that's Beryl Reid. The ultimate genteel English comedienne, who was simply divine as a Mary Whitehouse pastiche in The Goodies, is ludicrously miscast as Briggs. June Bland (Berger) would have been much better playing the freighter captain. The other contemporary I could have imagined in the role is Jane Sherwin, based on her turn as the rebel leader Kasabi in the Blake's 7 episode Pressure Point.
Another problem with Earthshock is the writing. This is not to criticise the action component, but it's obvious it has been written as a flashy, breakneck thriller for its own sake, rather than with the intent to tell a story. The plot-holes are gaping, the Cybermen act so illogically (but to be fair, they always have done) and some of the things that come out of the characters' mouths are embarrassing. Sarah Sutton is very good as Nyssa, despite being relegated to the TARDIS for the best part of three episodes, but she also has to say lines like "Whoever they are, they're fighting back!" Clare Clifford is convincing as Kyle in the first half of the story; similarly she's TARDIS bound in the latter and is made to deliver: "They're HUGE!" James Warwick is excellent as Scott, despite every second line being bravado nonsense. Thankfully Tegan's "I'm just a mouth on legs!" adds some rare sparkle.
While I'm being negative, I suppose it's only fair to point out the (few) weak points in Grimwade's direction: the two Cybermen chatting, an unfortunate shot of one's silver painted moon-boots, and the mix-up of extras when the Cyberman attempts to get inside the TARDIS in part four. But I've never been able to spot that woman reading the script in the corner!
Like Kinda and Black Orchid, Earthshock works because it is so different from the Doctor Who norm. It's a brave experiment, but should have remained a one-off rather than a template for future stories. But that's a matter for other reviews. Earthshock was in the right place at the right time: it was the Nathan-Turner era's first instance of monsters making a return appearance, the first glimpse of Hartnell and Troughton clips in God knows when (the first ever for me!) and a continued focus on the dramatic. If you viewed it only once, never to watch it again, it would remain in your mind as a masterpiece. Alas, Who fans will watch it over and over and naturally the weaker points will filter through, but it holds up well, remaining a high quality, important serial. And the cliffhanger to the first episode is one of the best ever! 8/10